DP Kindiki Fires Back at ‘Yes Sir’ Jibe, Stands by Ruto
Deputy President Kithure Kindiki has firmly reiterated his unwavering commitment to serve President William Ruto with absolute loyalty and dedication. He emphasized that his allegiance to the President is deliberate and without regret, as he fully embraces his role as the President’s principal assistant.
According to Kindiki, his primary responsibility is to support the Head of State in the execution of his mandate. He affirmed that this support is essential for the success of the Kenya Kwanza administration and that fulfilling the constitutional expectations of a deputy president requires unity, not rivalry, with the Head of State.
The Deputy President made it clear that he is fully aligned with President Ruto’s leadership and vision for the country. He stated that fulfilling the government’s agenda demands harmony within the executive, and that such alignment should not be misconstrued as weakness or lack of independent thought.
Kindiki’s remarks appeared to be a direct response to critics who have questioned his political posture. Some detractors have described him as a passive leader who is unwilling or unable to provide alternative views or challenge decisions when necessary. These critics argue that a strong deputy should be able to assert themselves independently, even when it contradicts the position of the President.
In defending his approach to leadership, Kindiki cited historical examples from Kenya’s political past. He referenced the late President Daniel Arap Moi, who served as Vice President under founding President Jomo Kenyatta. According to Kindiki, Moi was known for his consistent loyalty, frequently responding with agreement to Kenyatta’s directives. Despite criticism at the time, Moi eventually rose to become President.
Kindiki further pointed to the political trajectory of former President Mwai Kibaki, who served as Vice President under Moi for a decade. During his tenure as deputy, Kibaki maintained a cooperative relationship with Moi, even in situations where political tensions could have encouraged division.
[PCS]
He also highlighted the case of former President Uhuru Kenyatta, who, at one point, attempted to resist Kibaki’s leadership. Kindiki noted that senior political elders intervened and advised Kenyatta to align himself with Kibaki. This counsel, he said, ultimately contributed to Kenyatta’s eventual rise to the presidency.
Similarly, Kindiki mentioned that President William Ruto had previously served with loyalty under President Kenyatta before ascending to the highest office. These precedents, he suggested, demonstrate the long-term political value of loyalty and cooperation within government.
“We are people of saying yes, just like the late Daniel Moi told the late Jomo Kenyatta ‘yes’,” Kindiki stated. “Kibaki was Moi’s vice president for ten years, and he always said yes. When Uhuru tried opposing Kibaki, elders called him, and asked him to support Kibaki, and he later became president. Same with William Ruto, who was loyal to Uhuru.”
The Deputy President also addressed a broader issue concerning the conduct of government officials. He criticized those within government ranks who, according to him, behave in a manner akin to the opposition. In his view, it is illogical and self-defeating to oppose the government from within.
“There are those trying to teach us politics,” he said. “You can’t be in government and behave like opposition. If you want to oppose the President, then leave government and cross to the opposition.”
Kindiki’s remarks underscore a philosophy of governance rooted in internal cohesion, strategic patience, and fidelity to the constitutional hierarchy. He made it clear that he views his role not as a platform for personal political ambition, but as a duty to help the President fulfill his electoral promises to the Kenyan people.
The Deputy President’s message also suggests a broader political warning. He implied that disloyalty within government does not only disrupt the executive’s unity but may also derail the political futures of those involved. Kindiki’s historical references serve as both a justification for his stance and a subtle caution to his colleagues.
While defending his loyalty to the President, Kindiki also sought to reframe the conversation around leadership and influence. He argued that power and impact within government do not necessarily require public opposition or confrontation. Instead, he emphasized that strategic support and principled service can be equally, if not more, effective in influencing national direction.
In his view, those who insist on constant public dissent are engaging in political theater rather than genuine governance. He stated that there are proper avenues within government for raising concerns or offering alternative views, but that public defiance undermines the integrity and functionality of the administration.
Kindiki concluded his remarks by reaffirming his long-term commitment to supporting President Ruto in achieving the goals set out in the Kenya Kwanza manifesto. He asserted that his loyalty is based not only on personal conviction but also on a recognition of the broader national interest.
His comments signal a firm stance on leadership discipline within the executive and send a clear message to both supporters and critics. In Kindiki’s view, the path to national development is paved through unity, order, and a clear chain of command—principles he intends to uphold without compromise.
In Other News: Gachagua and Dorcas Steal the Show at Kalonzo Musyoka’s Son’s Lavish Wedding
DP Kindiki Fires Back at ‘Yes Sir’ Jibe, Stands by Ruto
